What is the Best Way to Write a Sample Essay For Your Job Application?

What is the Best Way to Write a Sample Essay For Your Job Application?How should you write a sample essay for your job application? In fact, you need to create a sample essay in a way that will make an impact on the first page of the application. It is important that you emphasize professional presence and influence with your paper. The sample essay that you create must display the traits of a professional resume.Firstly, you need to create a paper that can have the reader see the written word as one might see it. You need to make the reader feel that the paper is one that is professional in nature. Some papers may have professional qualities but they will not speak the English language like you or me would.It is important to use the paper to give your reader a glimpse of the professional way you work in and out of the office. They should be able to have a feeling that you are one who works with integrity and takes pride in what you do. By doing this, the reader will come to realize that you are someone they should hire and want to hire. Make sure that you emphasize how you have been given the chance to apply for the job as a professional.The next step in writing a professional paper is to write in a way that will show that you have excellent writing skills. Avoid using grammar errors that will make the reader question your skills. Do not use articles that contain incorrect grammar.Use all of the spaces available in the paper. Do not be afraid to include as much information as possible in your paper. You want to be able to take advantage of every space and allow yourself to be seen as someone who has been given a chance to be interviewed by a company.It is also important to make sure that you do not try to oversell yourself. When you use big words, you want to make sure that they do not overpower the content of the paper. Make sure that you do not show off your writing ability to the best of your ability.When you are applying for a job that is actually in the b uilding, you want to highlight a strong point about your background. You can do this by describing in detail your years at a college. You can also use these specific details to get inside the reader's head.Once you have created a sample essay, you need to make sure that you do not make the mistake of making it too general. The last thing you want to do is to tell a story about your past experience. Instead, focus on your work experience and how it will impact your future.

Existence of God Essay Example

Existence of God Essay There are many types of Cosmological argument, but it is better to concentrate on a small number of them and to probe their intricacies rather than to be content with general summaries. They all share many features in common in particular, they argue from the world to God and are thus a posteriori. In the Timaeus, Plato uses a Cosmological argument to arrive at the Demiurge, but it is Aristotles argument that has had most influence because it was used by St.Thomas Aquinas. Aristotle argued to an unmoved mover. This unmoved mover was not a personal God like the Christian God, and it had no religious significance rather, it should be seen as the ultimate cause of the Cosmos. Plotinus, in the third century, modified Platos argument, although again did not arrive at the Christian God. Plotinus God created the world from himself (and not from nothing) by a necessary unfolding of himself God had no choice. Plotinus God was also beyond all description and NEEDED to create in order to bec ome conscious (Process theology draws on this view). The Islamic and Jewish philosophers tended to be in advance of Christian philosophers in the early middle ages. Alfarabi and Avicenna put forward distinctive proofs, including the significant KALAM argument. The Jewish thinker Maimonides put forward an argument which led to a God similar to that of Aquinas he claimed that the I AM of the Old Testament has absolute existence, and that He alone exists necessarily and absolutely. AQUINAS ARGUMENT =================== We will write a custom essay sample on Existence of God specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Existence of God specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Existence of God specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Aquinas Five Ways are the cornerstone of Catholic Natural Theology because they claim to show that language about God successfully refers. However, Aquinas was not creating new arguments but using old ones; for example, Aquinas Fifth Way owed much to Platos argument in the Timaeus. In the Five Ways, Aquinas argues: 1. FROM MOTION 2. FROM EFFICIENT CAUSES 3. FROM CONTINGENCY AND NECESSITY 4. FROM GRADES OF PERFECTION IN THINGS, and 5. FROM DESIGN. It is not certain that Aquinas intended his arguments to establish the existence of God independent of faith. Lubor Veleckys book1, argues that Aquinas did not intend the arguments as proofs rather, he wished to show existing believers that it was rational to believe in God; he was not trying to convince atheists by philosophic argument. Velecky points out that Aquinas was already a firm believer, and wrote for a world which accepted Aristotelian categories he would never have expected the arguments (which he treats very briefly) to have had the weight they have subsequently been given. However, it is not necessarily the case that Velecky is right; it may well be held that Aquinas DID intend to produce proofs and, indeed, that his whole system depends on their success. The most interesting of Aquinas Five Ways is probably the third the argument from contingency. My summary of it is as follows: 1. Everything can be or not be 2. If this is so, given infinite time, at some time everything would not be 3. If there was once nothing, nothing could come from it 4. Therefore something must necessarily exist (NOTE MOST CAREFULLY that this is not God) 5. Everything necessary must be caused or uncaused 6. The series of necessary things cannot go on to infinity as there would then be no explanation for the series 7. Therefore there must be some Being having of itself its own necessity 8. This is what everyone calls God. It is important to note that the overall aim of Aquinas arguments is not to move back in a temporal sequence rather, they seek to establish DEPENDENCE, the dependence of the world on God now. Aquinas believed that there was no way of establishing that the Universe had a beginning in time this was a revealed doctrine. He did, however, believe that his arguments established the need for the world to be DEPENDENT on God. Aquinas arguments arrive at That which is necessary to explain the Universe or that which is necessary to explain motion, causation or contingency. We do not know what God is, but whatever God is, God is that which is necessary to explain the Universes existence. There is a jump, however, from whatever this is, to describing it as God. THIS GAVE RISE TO PASCALS QUOTE The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob not the God of the philosophers. Aquinas ends his proofs by saying This is what everyone calls God, but this can be challenged. Aquinas Prime Mover appears radically different from the God of most Christians. If we said that God was whatever sustains the universe in existence, we would be somewhere near to what Aquinas was saying but this whatever may be some way from Yahweh. It is important to recognize that Aquinas ends up with God as de re necessary necessary in and of himself and cause of himself. This is NOT meant to be the same as de dicto necessity (logical necessity, based on the way words are used for instance All spinsters are female) which applies in the Ontological argument. It is necessary to be clear on the difference between de re and de dicto necessity. The Ontological argument starts with de dicto necessity2 and attempts to arrive at de re necessity3. The de re necessary God is wholly simple. The crux of the notion of Divine simplicity is the identity of essence and existence in God God is not something that just happens to exist, Gods essence includes existence. God cannot be a material being because God: cannot have any intrinsic accidental properties: cannot, therefore, change in any way; and cannot be an individual of any given species or genus. Hence an absolutely necessary being does not have a nature in any straightforward sense at all.4 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM (1290 -1350) raised at least three problems which go to the heart of the Cosmological argument: 1) Ockham challenged Aquinas view that an infinite series was impossible. He maintained that causes could be ORIGINATING CAUSES and not CONSERVING CAUSES in other words, one cause could bring something else into existence but not then have to conserve its existence. A mother is responsible for bringing a baby into the world but not for retaining the baby in existence once it has grown. This is important as Aquinas wishes to establish that the world depends on God NOW; God did not just create the universe and then leave (Aquinas is not a deist). 2) Ockham queried whether there was any necessary link between cause and effect. This was the same point which was made by Hume centuries later the Cosmological argument depends on there being a necessary link between cause and effect. On the face of it, this seems a reasonable link to make, except that some scientists today claim that there are uncaused causes that certain fundamental particles come into existence without any explanation. One problem with this view is whether it is a true statement, or simply a reflection of our present ignorance. 3) Ockham did not think it possible to prove that there was only one God, nor that the most perfect possible being existed. There is a distinction between two possibilities. Either God is: i) The most perfect being that actually exists. In this case, there clearly is such a being (whatever it may be), but this does not mean it is the Christian God. Or ii) The most perfect being that could possibly exist. In this case, however, there is no way of showing that this POSSIBLE being is also an actual being. Christians maintain that God is the most perfect possible being. Ockhams claim is that the most that the Cosmological argument can establish is the most perfect being that actually exists, and there is no way of moving from this to showing that God is the most perfect possible being. It is in this sense that the Cosmological argument is sometimes held to depend on the Ontological, as the Ontological argument starts from the definition that God is the most perfect possible being. Ockhams point might be re-stated by claiming that this position is needed by Christianity but cannot be established by the Cosmological argument. Aquinas considered that Gods existence cannot be known to be necessary by understanding Gods nature, as human beings cannot know this nature. However, he considered that if we COULD know this nature (in the way that God does) THEN Gods existence would be seen to be necessary. Because of our lack of knowledge of Gods nature, Aquinas rejects the ontological argument and all his arguments move from features of the universe to God. Ockhams approach to Theology is distinctive and important. He often differed from Aquinas, and his arguments are frequently strong. His position deserves greater attention than it tends to be given! The same, incidentally, applies to the philosophy of Bonaventure and Duns Scotus. LEIBNIZ (1646 1716) ==================== The best known expression of Leibniz argument is based on the BOOK OF THE ELEMENTS OF GEOMETRY: Suppose the book of the elements of geometry to have been eternal, one copy always having been written down from an earlier one. It is evident that even though a reason can be given for the present book out of a past one, we should never come to a full reason. What is true of the books is also true of the states of the world. If you suppose the world eternal you will suppose nothing but a succession of states and will not find in any of them a sufficient reason. Leibniz often uses the word reason but it is clear that this effectively means cause. for instance he quotes the example of Archimedes balance which is held in equal balance unless there is a reason (i.e. cause) why one side should be weighed down. He argues for the existence of the ultimate reason of things which he takes to mean the ultimate cause of things. Effectively he wishes to maintain that everything (including the universe itself) must have a reason or cause for its existence and this must mean there is an ultimate, uncaused cause which he takes to be God. Leibniz considered that there must be a complete or sufficient explanation, and therefore the book (in the example above), like the world, must have had a first cause. Geisler and Corduan5 summarise Leibniz argument as follows: 1. The world we see is changing 2. Whatever is changing lacks within itself the reason for its own existence 3. There is a sufficient reason for everything either within itself or outside itself 4. Therefore there must be a cause beyond itself for its existence 5. Either this cause is itself caused or is its own sufficient reason 6. There cannot be an infinite regress of causes because this will never provide a sufficient reason 7. Therefore there must be a first Cause of the world which has no reason beyond itself but is its own sufficient reason. The key to this argument is the PRINCIPLE OF SUFFICIENT REASON, which Leibniz thought to be self-evidently true. In practice, people are normally content with proximate reasons reasons that satisfy. Thus the reason these notes are written is to make philosophic issues clearer to students. One might ask further questions such as why I bother since no-one reads them, whether this is the best way of helping students, or even why the students are studying Philosophy of Religion at all, but most people would not consider that there has to be an ultimate explanation of my action in order for the explanation to make sense. It is the assertion of an ultimate explanation that the Principle of Sufficient Reason maintains. Kai Neilsen says that If a series were literally infinite, there would be no need for there to be a first cause to get the causal order started, for there would always be a causal order since an infinite series can have no first member6. However even if a series existed eternally, then it could still be argued that God is needed to sustain the series which brings the discussion back to whether the whole causal series is simply a brute fact or requires God to explain it. Mackie7 maintains that Leibniz argument can be challenged in two ways: 1. Firstly by asking How do we know everything must have a sufficient reason? Leibniz asserts that this is the case but does not actually provide any compelling argument, 2. Secondly, How can there be a necessary being, one that contains its own sufficient reason? Leibniz does not have any compelling reason to show why the existence of such a being is necessary. HUMES CRITICISMS8 ================== Hume offers a sustained attack on the Cosmological arguments, and his arguments have since been developed and elaborated: 1. Like causes resemble like effects. The most that can be derived from finite effects will be finite causes. All that it is reasonable to do is to propose a cause adequate to explain the effect, and this will be a finite cause. Hume asks why one should not postulate male and female gods who are born and die, as the closer the analogy between causes in the world and causes of the world as a whole the closer should be the resemblance between us as agents who cause things and God. 2. We have no experience of universes being made. Nothing counts for or against the hypothesis about the origin of everything. Swinburne (The Existence of God) rejects this view as he argues that everything is unique under some description although Humes point is that we know about causes within the universe, and this does not entitle us to move to a cause of the universe as a whole. The essence of this point can be expressed by saying that it is one thing to say that every human being has a mother, but that one cannot move from this to say that there is a mother for the whole human race. 3. No proposition about existence can be logically necessary. The opposite of any statement about existence is always perfectly possible. This objection may rest on a confusion, as Aquinas does not claim that Gods existence is logically necessary instead he claims that the existence of God is necessary GIVEN motion, cause, contingency, etc.. God is not logically necessary God is de re necessary, necessary in and of himself. 4. The words necessary being have no consistent meaning. Any being claimed to exist may or may not exist. Hume stated this by saying that All existential propositions are synthetic. 5. If necessary being means only imperishable being, then the universe itself may be necessary. This is similar to Russells point in his debate with Copleston. IF one accepts (and Russell did not) that things in the world are contingent, why should not the Universe as a whole be necessary? We know from Einsteins principle of the conservation of matter that matter and energy remain constant, so why should matter and energy not be the constants that are necessary to explain the contingency of everything else? 6. An infinite series is possible. If this is true, then there need be no sufficient reason and no end to the regress of justification. 7. There is no way of establishing the principle of causality (see discussion of this point under Ockham above). KANTs CRITICISMS ================== Kants key criticism (although there are a number) is based on the claim that NO EXISTENTIAL STATEMENT CAN BE NECESSARY. Necessity only applies to thought; it cannot apply to being. Kant is, therefore, rejecting the idea of God as de re necessary. Brian Davies says that as God is not a something, we should not ask what caused God. But this is to put God into a special category (see Lee below), which Kant effectively rejects. Kant maintained that genuine knowledge and reasoning can only be about objects of possible experience and since we cannot experience the object which is God, we cannot reason our way to Him. You cannot move from physical premises to a metaphysical conclusion. We can, in other words, know about the PHENOMENA but not the NOUMENA. MARTIN LEE9 ============ Martin Lees point is that either God is something or God is nothing. If God is something we can ask what caused God, whilst if God is nothing God cannot be an explanation for the universe. Aquinas wants to deny this distinction. Aquinas maintains that God is neither something nor nothing God is in Gods own category. Brian Davies makes the same point, and it is central to the cosmological argument. There are various possible definitions of the Universe, thus: * DAVIES All existing things * COPLESTON The real or imagined totality or aggregate of individual objects. Lee maintains that if the world is the aggregate of objects, then the explanation of the existence of the world is the aggregate of the explanations of individual objects. So the cause of a chair is the carpenter, plus materials and tools. If the totality is no more than the aggregate, then once one has explained the existence of each item in the aggregate, there is no more to explain. IF the world is more than the aggregate then we are into the design argument. So Lee maintains that REVELATION and not Natural Theology tells us that the world was created and dependent. One of the crucial moves in the Cosmological argument is whether it is a legitimate move on the part of Aquinas to put God into a category of Gods own neither something nor nothing. Lee maintains that it is not but, perhaps, his argument rests on the idea that God must be in some sense an object in the Universe rather than in a category of Gods own. The latter view appears attractive, but critics could maintain that by putting God into a self-explanatory, unique category one is making an unjustified assumption which could be regarded as a somewhat ad hoc hypothesis. WHY POSTULATE THIS SPECIAL CATEGORY? DOES THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT REST ON A MISTAKE? ===================================================== Perhaps the whole idea of the Cosmological argument is misconceived; some philosophers have taken this view. I believe in God may not work according to the same logic as saying I believe in an undiscovered planet between earth and Mars. Rush Rhees maintains this view. He says: If you tried to explain to someone who had no idea of religion that there was a first cause, you could be arguing as follows: There must be a first cause, a Something and this something is more powerful, whatever that means, than anything else so you would not have been conceived or born but for the operation of Something, and Something might wipe everything out of existence at any time. Would THAT give us any idea of the wonder and glory of God? Surely he would reply: What a frightful idea! Like a Frankenstein without limit so that you cannot escape it the most ghastly nightmare. If my chief reason for worshipping God had to be a belief that a super-Frankenstein would blast me to Hell if I did not, then I hope I should have the decency to tell this being who is named Almighty God to go ahead and blast. Is the reason for worshipping God rather than the Devil that God is stronger than the Devil? GOD WILL GET YOU IN THE END AND THEN YOU WILL BE FOR IT. THINK OF THE FUTURE BOY, AND DONT THROW AWAY YOUR CHANCES. What a creeping, vile sort of thing this religion would be. God, Rush Rhees maintains, does not have MORE power than the Devil, God has a different sort of power. Both D.Z. Phillips and R.W. Hepburn consider, with Tillich, that: The Cosmological Argument degrades God to the level of the world. Tillich says: The arguments for the existence of God are neither arguments nor are they proofs of the existence of God, they are expressions of the Question of God which is implied by human finitude. D. Z. Phillips, in a chapter From world to God in his book Faith and Philosophic Enquiry, sees the Cosmological argument as an attempt to explain the world. In DostoyevskysThe Brothers Karamazov, Dimitri asks why a baby is crying he is not interested in the circumstances but in the larger question. QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MEANING OF THE WORLD AND THE MEANING OF LIFE ARE THE SAME. The meaning of life and of the world is, Phillips maintains, to be found WITHIN the Universe and not outside it. Phillips maintains that Gods love is other than the world as it means dying to the worlds way of looking at things. So the man who loves God cannot be harmed by any of the worlds suffering or evils. This is what Jesus meant when he said that perfect love casts out fear or when he talked of the peace that only he could give, or what Socrates meant when he said that The Good man cannot be harmed. Phillips, however, argues for a non-realist understanding of Gods existence (see my book, The Puzzle of God), so he would naturally reject the enterprise of which the Cosmological argument forms part. Whether he is right or not is a wider issue. FINALLY ======== At the end of the day, the key issue is possibly whether the world as a brute fact (Bertrand Russell) is more self-explanatory than God as the cause of the Universe. The Big Bang theory points to the idea that the universe had a beginning and that space and time came into existence with the Universe this is similar to the position which supporters of the Cosmological argument seek to establish. It also points to a God who is timeless and spaceless, since time and space would be dependent on the created Universe. However, whether the universe is the ultimate inexplicable fact, or whether God is the ultimate explanation, is what the argument is all about and this is not easy to establish. Believers in God may find the argument persuasive; others may be less convinced. Hick and Swinburne are examples of philosophers who take different views on this and it is essential, if the argument is to succeed, to show why God is the better ultimate explanation. Swinburne (The Existence of God10) maintains that God is a SIMPLER explanation than the brute fact of the universe because God provides a personal explanation but this is debatable. Aquinas certainly considered that God was metaphysically simple (this is the defining characteristic of the Thomist God from which other features such as Gods timelessness, immutability, spacelessness, bodilessness, etc. are derived), but this is VERY different from saying that God provides a simple explanation. Also, it is all very well saying that God is personal, but it is far from clear what personal means when applied to the wholly simple God it certainly cannot be understood univocally (see The Puzzle of God 11for a discussion on analogy and metaphor in religious language) since God is not personal in the same sense as a human being is personal.

buy custom English Education essay

buy custom English Education essay English education that I am receiving now will be of great help to me when I am employed. During our English Lessons, the lecturers teach writing which is a very important part in the business world. There are different forms of writing. Minutes writing is part of what we learn in the English lessons. To be able to write the correct minutes of a meeting one should know the format to be used and how a minute looks like. Without my English Education, I will not be able to write a minute even if it is my duty as a secretary. Letter writing is also an important task in any business. Letters are written daily to different people in the business community. Letters have to be written following the correct format. The different formats and types of letters are taught in school. The letter that is written should have good grammar and be in the correct tenses. If the letter written to a certain person is in the wrong tense, the recipient might misunderstand the wrong tense then the information you are trying to pass. Courtesy is a very important quality that every employee must have. It does not apply to the spoken English only. It is also important when communicatng with someone through a letter. One should observe courtesy when writing letters. The uses of words such as thank you, in regards are very important in convincing the other person. Such language helps in as it portrays a good image to a person who has not seen you but has only read your letter. The grammar that we are taught in school is very useful in the business world. With good grammar, one is able to pass the message that is required correctly without causing any misunderstandings. In English lessons, we are taught how to write agendas. These are useful in the business world, as there are many meetings that take place. There are many areas in the world of business where communication is through memos and notices. Without these skills in writing of agendas, memos, and notices, it will be very difficult to communicate with the rest of my colleagues and superiors. As an employee, I should be able to write minutes properly, write agendas and memos. Writing E- mails is advancement in technology. Many businesses have opted to using Emails to communicate with the other businesses or even with their employees. One should be able to write an Email correctly using goood grammar and following the correct format. If an Email is badly written, it has cost the business a lot of money. A badly written email to a supplier can cost the business a lot of money as the supplier may decide to cancel a contract due to a small mistake. Writing forms part of the English Education that I am receiving. As employees, the presentations we make, in form of writing, can cost either the company or business in a positive or negative way. A well-written letter, Email, or memo passes the required information to the recipient making the work easier. If, for example, a manager wants to tell the accountant to make a deposit of a certain amount to a certain business but instead tell him not to deposit the money, the company will lose a lot of money in such an event. However, a well-written form of communication will pass the correct information to the recipient hence the business or company is able to operate smoothly. Grammar will help in ensuring that any written material has correct spelling, correct tenses and this will ensure that information in the business is efficient. Buy custom English Education essay

Critical and strategic understanding of Information Technology in UK's Essay

Critical and strategic understanding of Information Technology in UK's universities and improvement to this given service - Essay Example All these in turn results competitive services offered by the business or organization in comparison to the competitor (Gronroos, 2000). Effective service design requires developing the critical and strategic level understanding of the services required by the customers of the organization (Hollins & Hollins, 1991). Therefore, the aim of this report is to develop the comprehensive understanding of the service requirement of the customers of the universities of UK from its information technology based attendance monitoring system. The paper in specific reference to the literature review in the context of the service design will determine the service requirement from IT based student attendance monitoring system in the universities of UK. The paper has found that service design appears to have significant involvement in the universities’ attendance systems. It is despite fact that service organizations are less involved in integrating service design. Finally, the improvement rec ommendations are made for the university attendance system. LITERATURE REVIEW AND RELEVANCE TO THE IT IN UK UNIVERSITIES The service design, simply stating, is aimed at transforming the service that is provided to the customer more useful. The services that are delivered to the customer result in more effective, efficient, usable as well as desirable by the customer once are provided in accordance to the critically developed design (Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry, 1988). Hence, the process and system that uses the strategic level considerations in devising the path through which the product or service are provided to the customer result in winning customer preference (Moritz, 2005). This win-win situation distinguishes the company’s product among large number of homogeneous products and services (DC, 2013). Herrmann, Huber, & Braunstein, (2000) have defined that service design is the domain that enable the organization to explore the potential strategic possibilities within their business model. Service designing uniquely offers the organization to present the new services by redesigning the pattern of the old service (Goldstein et al., 2002). Moritz (2005) and Salter and Tether (2006) state that as the difference between the product and service is quite evident; therefore, the system of designing and implementing service also requires considering different aspects. These features include considering the uniqueness of the customer requirement, expertise from all related and involved field and most important aspect that needs consideration is the on-going and constantly changing nature of services. Therefore, difference service design categories are determined by Moritz (2005) as depicted as follows: (Kytola and Pakkila, 2012) It is important to understand that companies are able to achieve the distinction only on the basis of the good service design. Therefore, good service design shall ensure that process is successful in deliberately designing the e xperience that customer of the company perceives more valuable. Also the factor that distinguishes a good service design from others is the similar level of valuable experience generated for the service

Gerontology Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Gerontology - Essay Example It means that, that reliance becomes a way of finessing ethical decision making among professionals and therefore excusing what might a violation of ethics by asserting that there is no definitive standard that has been violated. In gerontology, ethical decision-making, mentoring relationships and ethical behavior is clearly more than just following of minimal law and ethical codes (Hooyman & Kiyak, 2008). It means that, for an instant; in mentoring relationships, one has to be continuously aware that some actions done by a gerontologist may be wrong irrespective of whether the law was broken or code violated. However, it is of much value that one considers professional code of ethics since they might apply during the mentoring of a gerontologist. Codes of ethics for professional gerontologists are the principles and ethical standards that depict the responsibilities and professional conduct of gerontologists. The principles are used to guide a gerontologist while performing their everyday activities and in case issues arise in their professional work. Professional competence is one key principle that gerontologists should observe while working (Wiersman & Dupuis, 2007). A gerontologist should distinguish the limitations that exist in their multidisciplinary expertise and should, therefore, undertake tasks that they are qualified in relation to their training, education and experience. In order to maintain competence at work, gerontologist will continue with their education. Competencies include skill, attitude, knowledge, behavior and judgment of a gerontologist. It is vital for a professional to recognize that most behaviors have cultural meaning; therefore, one needs to view the behavior within contextual issues of the pat ient (Hinrichsen, 2006). One should be able to recognize the communication changes that affect older adults in their care and formulate strategies that will meet the need of the patient for optimum communication

Food Preservation Essay Example for Free

Food Preservation Essay Men have preserved their foods from ancient times in order to keep the results of harvesting for winter months, for resale, for storage, and for transporting from sea to inland, overseas, or cross-country. To do so, they generally used natures methods, which are drying, parching and fermenting. Parching is the most natural method, but for many thousands of years, others have also been used. Direct fermentation of liquids, usually by the introduction of yeast, has not only preserved liquids but also enhanced their quality, the same of course applying to salting. Smoking has preserved, and sometimes improved both fish and meat. Hickory wood is generally used for the fires, and natural juices are contained by a slight coating of wood creosote. It was not until recently that the causes of rottenness were understood, these being the reactions of bacteria, molds, yeasts and micro-organisms. Some fermentation and molds are, of course, necessary in the production of food and drink; molds, for example, being used in cheese-making. But the real breakthrough in preservation against the causes of rottenness came, when it was learnt how to deal with the micro-organisms present in all foods and drinks, and which react chemically over a period to produce unpalatable or poisonous food or drink. There are three basic methods. Firstly, food may be preserved by cooling or freezing, to a very low temperature when long-term preservation is required. This was originally done by packing in a mixture of salt and ice; today, cold storage is big business and refrigeration is a highly-developed science. Dehydration may be bracketed with this method, as the principle involved is the same, namely to suspend the operation of bacteria which requires normal temperatures for chemical reaction. This is why reconstituted eggs cannot against dehydrated, and melted ice-cream refrozen. The second method of destruction is by heat-processes, which destroy all the bacteria present in food and drink. This process is used before canning foods in hermetically-sealed containers, great care being taken not to allow the foods or drink s to become re-infested after cooling and before canning. The third method is to preserve by the addition of chemicals, which control or destroy bacteria. This is merely a follow-up of the old systems of salting, smoking and candling. Eventually, the method of cold sterilization is expected to supersede most of the others; this amounts to exposing the food-stuffs to ionizing radiation. Today more than mere food-preservation is sought by the consumer, and for this reason, processes are becoming more and more sophisticated. Quality, economy and convenience are sought by modern man especially modern woman convenience is important, the ready-cooked meal is popular, while, in Western, or Westernized communities, goods do not sell easily if they lack color, a good appearance, natural flavor, the right texture, and are free from defects.

Sun Microsystems, Inc. Essay -- GCSE Business Marketing Coursework

Sun Microsystems, Inc. Sun Microsystems, Inc. is a worldwide provider of products, services and support solutions for building and maintaining network-computing environments. The Company sells scalable computer systems, high-speed microprocessors and high performance software for operating network computing equipment and storage products. The Company also provides support, education and professional services. The Company's products are used for many demanding commercial and technical applications in various industries including telecommunications, manufacturing, financial services, education, retail, government, energy and healthcare. Sun Microsystems' lines of business include Computer Systems and Storage, Enterprise Services, Software Systems and Network Service Provider. Computer Systems and Storage designs, develops and brings to market desktop systems, servers, storage and network switches, incorporating the UltraSPARC microprocessors and the Solaris Operating Environment. This segment also designs and develops UltraSPARC and MAJC microprocessors, computer board platforms, processor modules, chip sets and logic products for Sun systems products and OEM customers. The Company's workstation products include the Ultra5, Ultra 10, Ultra 60 and Ultra 80 models. The Ultra 5 workstation is used for business applications and for software development. The Ultra 10 workstation offers value and performance for 3-D graphics applications and is designed for applications such as drafting and design, animation and rendering, modeling and analysis. The Ultra 60 workstation, in both single and dual processor configurations, is suited for modeling and virtual prototyping, medical imaging, animation and geosciences. Finally, the Ultra 80 workstation has the highest memory bandwidth in the workstation product line with uniprocessor, dual-processor, and quad-processor configuration, and is well-suited for simulation, design and analysis, modeling and virtual prototyping, animation, imaging and visualization, medical imaging, research and development and financial modeling. Enterprise Services provides global services and support for heterogeneous network computing environments, including system/network management, systems integration, and support, education, and professional services. The Company's Sun Enterprise servers consist of workgroup servers, mid-range servers ... ... America Online, Inc. (AOL), the Sun-Netscape Alliance, the Company designs, develops, markets, and sells enterprise and E-commerce software for consumers and businesses under the iPlanet brand. These software products and technologies, commonly referred to as middleware, complement the Company's enterprise servers, storage and workstation products. Combined, these products provide customers with comprehensive solutions to their enterprise and Internet computing needs. In December 2000, the Company compelted the acquisition of Cobalt Networks, Inc., a provider of server appliances for Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Application Service Providers (ASPs), and small- to medium-sized businesses. The Company's competitors include Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), International Business Machines Corporation, Compaq Computer Corporation (Compaq) and EMC Corporation (EMC). The Company also competes with systems manufacturers and resellers of systems based on microprocessors from Intel Corporation (Intel) and Windows NT operating system software from Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft). These competitors include Dell Computer Corporation, HP and Compaq, in addition to Intel and Microsoft.